What Is Called When You Write Something About an Art Piece

In psychology of art, the relationship between art and emotion has newly been the subject of extensive written report cheers to the intervention of esteemed fine art historian Alexander Nemerov. Emotional or aesthetic responses to art have previously been viewed as basic stimulus response, but new theories and research have suggested that these experiences are more complex and able to be studied experimentally.^[1] Emotional responses are often regarded as the keystone to experiencing art, and the creation of an emotional feel has been argued as the purpose of artistic expression.^[2] Enquiry has shown that the neurological underpinnings of perceiving art differ from those used in standard object recognition.^[3] Instead, brain regions involved in the experience of emotion and goal setting bear witness activation when viewing art.^[three]

Basis for emotional responses to art [edit]

Evolutionary ancestry has hard-wired humans to have affective responses for certain patterns and traits. These predispositions lend themselves to responses when looking at certain visual arts as well. Identification of subject field matter is the first step in understanding the visual image. Being presented with visual stimuli creates initial confusion. Being able to cover a figure and background creates closure and triggers the pleasure centers of the brain by remedying the defoliation. Once an paradigm is identified, meaning can be created by accessing memory relative to the visual stimuli and associating personal memories with what is being viewed.^[four]

Other methods of stimulating initial interest that tin lead to emotion involves blueprint recognition. Symmetry is often institute in works of fine art, and the human being brain unconsciously searches for symmetry for a number of reasons. Potential predators were bilaterally symmetrical, equally were potential prey. Bilateral symmetry as well exists in humans, and a salubrious human is typically relatively symmetrical. This attraction to symmetry was therefore advantageous, equally it helped humans recognize danger, food, and mates. Fine art containing symmetry therefore is typically approached and positively valenced to humans.^[4]

Another case is to observe paintings or photographs of vivid, open landscapes that often evoke a feeling of beauty, relaxation, or happiness. This connection to pleasant emotions exists because information technology was advantageous to humans before today'southward gild to be able to see far into the altitude in a brightly lit vista. Similarly, visual images that are nighttime and/or obscure typically elicit emotions of anxiety and fear. This is because an impeded visual field is disadvantageous for a human being to be able to defend itself.^[v]

Meta-emotions [edit]

The optimal visual artwork creates what Noy & Noy-Sharav phone call "meta-emotions". These are multiple emotions that are triggered at the aforementioned time. They posit that what people see when immediately looking at a slice of artwork are the formal, technical qualities of the work and its complication. Works that are well-made simply defective in appropriate complexity, or works that are intricate just missing in technical skill will non produce "meta-emotions".^[six] For case, seeing a perfectly painted chair (technical quality but no complexity) or a sloppily drawn image of Christ on the cross (complex but no skill) would be unlikely to stimulate deep emotional responses. Nonetheless, beautifully painted works of Christ'southward crucifixion are likely brand people who can relate or who empathize the story behind it weep.

Noy & Noy-Sharav also claim that art is the most stiff form of emotional communication. They cite examples of people existence able to heed to and trip the light fantastic to music for hours without getting tired and literature beingness able to take people to far away, imagined lands within their heads. Art forms give humans a higher satisfaction in emotional release than but managing emotions on their own. Art allows people to accept a cathartic release of pent-upwardly emotions either past creating work or by witnessing and pseudo-experiencing what they come across in front end of them. Instead of being passive recipients of actions and images, art is intended for people to challenge themselves and work through the emotions they see presented in the artistic message.^[6]

Ofttimes, people have a difficulty recognizing and explicitly expressing the emotions they are feeling. Art tends to have a way to accomplish people's emotions on a deeper level and when creating art, it is a way for them to release the emotions they cannot otherwise limited. There is a professional denomination within psychotherapy chosen art therapy or creative arts therapy in which deals with various ways of coping with emotions and other cognitive dimensions.^[seven]

Types of elicited emotions [edit]

Art is a man activity, consisting in this, that one man consciously, by means of certain external signs, hands on to others feelings he has lived through, and that other people are infected by these feeling and also experience them.

--Leo Tolstoy, What Is Fine art? (1897)^[viii]

There is contend among researchers as to what types of emotions works of fine art can elicit; whether these are defined emotions such equally anger, confusion or happiness, or a general feeling of aesthetic appreciation.^[9] The aesthetic experience seems to be determined by liking or disliking a work of fine art, placed along a continuum of pleasance–displeasure.^[9] However, other various emotions tin can however be felt in response to fine art, which can be sorted into three categories: Knowledge Emotions, Hostile Emotions, and Self-Conscious Emotions.^[9]

Liking and comprehensibility [edit]

Pleasure elicited by works of art can likewise have multiple sources. A number of theories suggest that enjoyment of a work of art is dependent on its comprehensibility or power to exist understood hands.^[10] Therefore, when more than information about a work of art is provided, such every bit a title, description, or artist's statement, researchers predict that viewers volition sympathise the slice better, and demonstrate greater liking for information technology.^[ten] Experimental evidence shows that the presence of a title increases perceived understanding, regardless of whether that championship is elaborate or descriptive.^[10] Elaborate titles did touch on aesthetic responses to the work, suggesting viewers were not creating alternative explanations for the works if an explaining title is given.^[10] Descriptive or random titles exercise not bear witness any of these effects.^[10]

Furthering the thought that pleasance in fine art derives from its comprehensibility and processing fluency, some authors have described this feel equally an emotion.^[11] The emotional feeling of beauty, or an aesthetic experience, does not take a valence emotional undercurrent. Rather information technology is general cognitive arousal due to the fluent processing of a novel stimuli.^[11] Some authors believe that aesthetic emotions is enough of a unique and verifiable experience that information technology should be included in full general theories of emotion.^[11]

Art is the emotional expression of human personality.

--Eugène Véron, L'Esthetique (1882)^[12]

Noesis emotions [edit]

Cognition emotions deal with reactions to thinking and feeling, such as interest, defoliation, awe, and surprise.^[9] They oftentimes stem from self-assay of what the viewer knows, expects, and perceives.^[9] ^[xiii] This set of emotions as well spur actions that motivate further learning and thinking.^[9]

Emotions are momentary states and differ in intensity depending on the person. Each emotion elicits a unlike response. Surprise completely wipes the brain and torso of whatever other thoughts or functions because everything is focused on the possibility of danger. Interest ties in with curiosity and humans are a curious species. Interest spikes learning and exploration. Confusion goes paw in paw with interest, because when learning something new, it tin oftentimes be difficult to understand, peculiarly if unfamiliar. Notwithstanding, confusion too promotes learning and thinking. Awe is a state of wonder, and it is the deepest of the knowledge emotions every bit well equally very uncommon.^[14]

Interest [edit]

Involvement in a piece of work of art arises from perceiving the work every bit new, complex, and unfamiliar, equally well as understandable.^[ix] ^[13] This dimension is studied most often by aesthetics researchers, and can exist equated with aesthetic pleasance or an aesthetic experience.^[nine] This phase of art feel usually occurs as the viewer understands the artwork they are viewing, and the art fits into their knowledge and expectations while providing a new experience.^[xiii]

Confusion [edit]

Confusion can be viewed as an reverse to interest, and serves as a signal to the cocky to inform the viewer that they cannot comprehend what they are looking at, and confusion oft necessitates a shift in action to remedy the lack of understanding.^[9] ^[13] Confusion is thought to stem from uncertainty, and a lack of one'due south expectations and knowledge beingness met by a work of art.^[13] Confusion is almost oft experienced by art novices, and therefore must often be dealt with by those in arts instruction.^[9]

Surprise [edit]

Surprise functions equally a disruption of current action to alert a viewer to a pregnant event.^[9] The emotion is centered around the feel of something new and unexpected, and tin can be elicit by sensory incongruity.^[ix] Fine art can elicit surprise when expectations about the work are non met, but the work changes those expectations in an understandable way.

Hostile emotions [edit]

Hostile emotions toward fine art are often very visible in the grade of anger or frustration, and can event in censorship, but are less hands described past a continuum of artful pleasure-displeasure.^[9] These reactions middle effectually the hostility triad: acrimony, cloy, and contempt.^[nine] These emotions often motivate aggression, self-assertion, and violence, and arise from perception of the artist'south deliberate trespass onto the expectations of the viewer.^[9]

Self-conscious emotions [edit]

Self-witting emotions are responses that reflect upon the self and ane'southward deportment, such as pride, guilt, shame, regret and embarrassment.^[ix] These are much more complex emotions, and involve assessing events as agreeing with one'due south self-perception or not, and adjusting 1's behavior accordingly.^[9] There are numerous instances of artists expressing cocky-conscious emotions in response to their fine art, and cocky-conscious emotions can also be felt collectively.^[9]

Sublime feelings [edit]

Researchers have investigated the feel of the sublime, viewed every bit similar to aesthetic appreciation, which causes full general psychological arousal.^[15] The sublime feeling has been connected to a feeling of happiness in response to art, but may exist more than related to an experience of fear.^[fifteen] Researchers have shown that feelings of fearfulness induced earlier looking at artwork results in more than sublime feelings in response to those works.^[xv]

Artful chills [edit]

Another common emotional response is that of chills when viewing a work of art. The feeling is predicted to be related to similar aesthetic experiences such as awe, feeling touched, or assimilation.^[sixteen] Personality traits along the Big five Inventory have been shown to exist predictors of a person's experience of aesthetic chills, particularly a high rating on Openness to Experience.^[16] Feel with the arts also predicts someone's experience of aesthetic chills, just this may exist due to them experiencing art more oftentimes.^[16]

Effects of expertise [edit]

The fact that art is analyzed and experienced differently by those with creative training and expertise than those who are artistically naive has been shown numerous times. Researchers have tried to empathise how experts collaborate with art so differently from the art naive, as experts tend to like more abstract compositions, and show a greater liking for both modern and classical types of art.^[17] Experts also exhibit more arousal when looking at mod and abstract works, while non-experts evidence more arousal to classical works.^[17]

Other researchers predicted that experts observe more complex art interesting considering they have changed their appraisals of art to create more interest, or are possibly making completely different types of appraisals than novices.^[18] Experts described works rated high in complexity as easier to understand and more interesting than did novices, maybe as experts tend to utilize more than idiosyncratic criteria when judging artworks.^[xviii] Still, experts seem to utilise the same appraisals of emotions that novices do, simply these appraisals are at a higher level, considering a wider range of art is comprehensible to experts.^[18]

Expertise and museum visits [edit]

Due to most fine art being in museums and galleries, most people have to make deliberate choices to interact with art. Researchers are interested in what types of experiences and emotions people are looking for when going to experience art in a museum.^[19] Most people reply that they visit museums to experience 'the pleasure of art' or 'the desire for cultural learning', but when broken down, visitors of museums of classical art are more motivated to meet famous works and learn more nearly them.^[19] Visitors in contemporary art museums were more than motivated by a more than emotional connexion to the art, and went more for the pleasure than a learning experience.^[19] Predictors of who would prefer to go to which type of museum lay in education level, art fluency, an socio-economical status.^[xix]

Theories and models of elicited emotions [edit]

Researchers have offered a number of theories to describe emotional responses to art, often aligning with the various theories of the basis of emotions. Authors take argued that the emotional experience is created explicitly past the artist and mimicked in the viewer, or that the emotional experience of art is a past-production of the analysis of that work.^[1] ^[2]

Appraisal theory [edit]

The appraisal theory of emotions centers on the assumption that it is the evaluation of events, and not the events themselves, that cause emotional experiences.^[1] Emotions are then created by different groups of appraisal structures that events are analyzed through.^[ane] When applied to art, appraisal theories fence that various artistic structures, such every bit complexity, prototypically, and understanding are used as appraisal structures, and works that show more than typical art principles will create a stronger artful feel .^[1] Appraisal theories suggest that art is experienced every bit interesting after existence analyzed through a novelty cheque and coping-potential cheque, which analyze the art'southward newness of experience for the viewer, and the viewer's power to understand the new experience.^[1] Experimental show suggests that art is preferred when the viewer finds information technology easier to empathise, and that interest in a work is predictable with noesis of the viewer'due south ability to procedure circuitous visual works, which supports the appraisal theory.^[i] People with higher levels of artistic expertise and knowledge often prefer more complex works of art. Nether appraisal theory, experts have a different emotional feel to fine art due to a preference for more than complex works that they can understand meliorate than a naive viewer.^[1]

Appraisal and negative emotions [edit]

A newer have on this theory focuses on the consequences of the emotions elicited from art, both positive and negative. The original theory argues that positive emotions are the result of a biobehavioral reward arrangement, where a person feels a positive emotion when they have completed a personal goal.^[20] These emotional rewards create actions by motivating approach or withdrawal from a stimuli, depending if the object is positive or negative to the person.^[20] However, these theories have not often focused on negative emotions, specially negative emotional experiences from art.^[20] These emotions are central to experimental aesthetics research in social club to sympathize why people have negative, rejecting, condemning, or censoring reactions to works of fine art.^[20] By showing research participants controversial photographs, rating their feelings of anger, and measuring their subsequent actions, researchers establish that the participants that felt hostile toward the photographs displayed more rejection of the works.^[20] This suggests that negative emotions towards a work of art can create a negative action toward information technology, and suggests the demand for further enquiry on negative reactions towards art.^[20]

Minimal model [edit]

Other psychologists believe that emotions are of minimal functionality, and are used to move a person towards incentives and away from threats.^[21] Therefore, positive emotions are felt upon the attainment of a goal, and negative emotions when a goal has failed to be accomplished.^[21] The basic states of pleasure or pain tin can be adapted to aesthetic experiences by a disinterested buffer, where the experience is non explicitly related to the goal-reaching of the person, only a similar feel can be analyzed from a disinterested altitude.^[21] These emotions are disinterested because the work of fine art or artist's goals are not affecting the person'due south well-being, but the viewer tin can experience whether or not those goals were achieved from a third-party distance.

Five-step aesthetic experience [edit]

Other theorists have focused their models on the disrupting and unique feel that comes from the interacting with a powerful piece of work of art. An early model focused on a two-part feel: facile recognition and meta-cognitive perception, or the experience of the work of fine art and the mind'south assay of that experience.^[22] A further cognitive model strengthens this thought into a five-part emotional experience of a piece of work of art.^[22] As this v-part model is new, it remains only a theory, every bit non much empirical evidence for the model had been researched yet.

Office i: Pre-expectations and self-image [edit]

The first stage of this model focuses on the viewer'southward expectations of the work before seeing information technology, based on their previous experiences, their observational strategies, and the relation of the work to themselves.^[22] Viewers who tend to appreciate art, or know more virtually information technology will have different expectations at this stage than those who are not engaged by art.^[22]

Part 2: Cognitive mastery and introduction of discrepancy [edit]

After viewing the work of art, people will make an initial judgment and classification of the work, often based on their preconceptions of the work.^[22] Subsequently initial nomenclature, viewers try to understand the motive and significant of the piece of work, which can then inform their perception of the work, creating a cycle of changing perception and the attempt to sympathize information technology.^[22] It is at this signal any discrepancies between expectations and the work, or the work and understanding arise.^[22]

Office three: Secondary control and escape [edit]

When an individual finds a discrepancy in their understanding that cannot exist resolved or ignored, they motility to the third stage of their interaction with a work of art.^[22] At this betoken, interaction with the work has switched from lower-order and unconscious processes to higher-club cognitive involvement, and tension and frustration starts to be felt.^[22] In society to maintain their self-assumptions and to resolve the piece of work, an private will try to change their environment in lodge for the upshot to be resolved or ignored.^[22] This tin be washed by re-classifying the piece of work and its motives, blaming the discrepancy on an external source, or attempting to escape the situation or mentally withdraw from the work.^[22]

Part four: Meta-cognitive reassessment [edit]

If viewers cannot escape or reassess the work, they are forced to reassess the self and their interactions with works of fine art.^[22] This experience of self-awareness through a piece of work of art is often externally caused, rather than internally motivated, and starts a transformative process to understand the pregnant of the discrepant work, and edit their ain self-paradigm.^[22]

Part five: Aesthetic effect and new mastery [edit]

After the cocky-transformation and change in expectations, the viewer resets their interaction with the work, and begins the procedure anew with deeper self-understanding and cerebral mastery of the artwork.^[22]

Pupillary response tests [edit]

In society to research emotional responses to art, researchers oftentimes rely on behavioral data.^[23] But new psychophysilogical methods of measuring emotional response are beginning to be used, such as the measurement of pupillary response.^[23] Educatee responses have been predicted to indicate paradigm pleasantness and emotional arousal, but can be confounded by luminance, and confusion betwixt an emotion'south positive or negative valence, requiring an accompanying verbal explanation of emotional state.^[24] Pupil dilatations accept been found to predict emotional responses and the amount of information the brain is processing, measures important in testing emotional response elicited past artwork.^[23] Further, the existence of pupillary responses to artwork can be used as an statement that art does elicit emotional responses with physiological reactions.^[23]

An example Cubist work by Juan Gris

Pupil responses to art [edit]

After viewing Cubist paintings of varying complexity, abstraction, and familiarity, participants' pupil responses were greatest when viewing aesthetically pleasing artwork, and highly accessible art, or art low in brainchild.^[23] Educatee responses also correlated with personal preferences of the cubist art.^[23] High pupil responses were also correlated with faster cognitive processing, supporting theories that aesthetic emotions and preferences are related to the encephalon's ease of processing the stimuli.^[23]

Left-cheek biases [edit]

Minerva Rembrandt. Female portrait showing left-cheek orientation

These effects are also seen when investigating the Western preference for left-facing portraits. This skew towards left-cheek is plant in the bulk of Western portraits, and is rated equally more pleasing than other portrait orientations.^[25] Theories for this preference suggest that the left side of the face up every bit more emotionally descriptive and expressive, which lets viewers connect to this emotional content better.^[25] Pupil response tests were used to exam emotional response to dissimilar types of portraits, left or correct cheek, and pupil dilation was linearly related to the pleasantness of the portrait, with increased dilations for pleasant images, and constrictions for unpleasant images.^[25] Left-facing portraits were rated as more pleasant, even when mirrored to announced right-facing, suggesting that people are more attracted to more emotional facial depictions.^[25]

This research was connected, using portraits by Rembrandt featuring females with a left-cheek focus and males with a correct-cheek focus.^[24] Researchers predicted Rembrandt chose to portray his subjects this way to arm-twist different emotional responses in his viewers related to which portrait cheek was favored.^[24] In comparison to previous studies, increased pupil size was only found for male portraits with a right-cheek preference. This may be because the portraits were viewed as domineering, and the subsequent pupil response was due to unpleasantness.^[24] As pupil dilation is more indicative of strength of emotional response than the valence, a verbal description of emotional responses should accompany farther pupillary response tests.^[24]

Fine art as emotional regulation [edit]

Art is also used as an emotional regulator, almost frequently in Fine art Therapy sessions. Art therapy is a form of therapy that uses artistic activities such as painting, sculpture, sketching, and other crafts to allow people to express their emotions and detect pregnant in that art to find trauma and ways to experience healing. Studies have shown that creating fine art can serve as a method of short-term mood regulation.^[26] ^[27] This type of regulation falls into two categories: venting and distraction.^[26] Artists in all fields of the arts have reported emotional venting and lark through the creation of their art.^[26] ^[27]

Venting [edit]

Venting through fine art is the procedure of using fine art to attend to and discharge negative emotions.^[26] However, research has shown venting to be a less effective method of emotional regulation. Research participants asked to draw either an image related to a lamentable pic they just watched, or a neutral house, demonstrated less negative mood after the neutral drawing.^[26] Venting drawings did meliorate negative mood more than than no drawing activity.^[26] Other research suggests that this is because analyzing negative emotions can have a helpful result, but immersing in negative emotions can accept a deleterious event.^[27]

Distraction [edit]

Distraction is the process of creating art to oppose, or in spite of negative emotions.^[26] This tin also take the form of fantasizing, or creating an opposing positive to counteract a negative bear on.^[27] Research has demonstrated that distractive fine art making activities ameliorate mood greater than venting activities.^[26] Distractive drawings were shown to decrease negative emotions more than than venting drawings or no drawing chore even after participants were asked to recall their saddest personal memories.^[26] These participants also experienced an increase in positive bear upon afterwards a distractive drawing task.^[26] The change in mood valence afterwards a distractive drawing chore is even greater when participants are asked to create happy drawings to counter their negative mood.^[27]

References [edit]

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^k ^h Silvia, Paul J. (ane January 2005). "Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion" (PDF). Review of Full general Psychology. 9 (4): 342–357. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342.
^ ^a ^b Fellous, Jean-Marc (2006). "A mechanistic view of the expression and experience of emotion in the arts. Deeper that reason: Emotion and its office in literature, music and art by Jenefer Robinson". The American Journal of Psychology. 119 (iv): 668–674. doi:ten.2307/20445371. JSTOR 20445371.
^ ^a ^b Cupchik, Gerald C.; Vartanian, Oshin; Crawley, Adrian; Mikulis, David J. (i June 2009). "Viewing artworks: Contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to artful experience". Encephalon and Cognition. seventy (one): 84–91. doi:ten.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.003. PMID 19223099.
^ ^a ^b Barry, A (2006). "Perceptual Aesthetics: Transcendent Emotion, Neurological Prototype". Visual Communication Quarterly. xiii (3): 134–151. doi:10.1207/s15551407vcq1303_2.
^ Carroll, N (2003). "Art and Mood". Monist. 86 (iv): 521–555. doi:10.5840/monist200386426.
^ ^a ^b Noy, P.; Noy-Sharav, D. (2013). "Art and Emotions". International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 10 (2): 100–107. doi:ten.1002/aps.1352.
^ "American Fine art Therapy Association". American Fine art Therapy Association . Retrieved 2021-07-02 .
^ Maude, Aylmer (1902). Essays on art: I. An introduction to "What is art?"; Two. Tolstoy's view of art. Grant Richards. p. 34. Retrieved ii November 2012.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^east ^f ^{one thousand} ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r Silvia, Paul J. (1 Jan 2009). "Looking by pleasure: Acrimony, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual artful emotions" (PDF). Psychology of Aesthetics, Inventiveness, and the Arts. 3 (1): 48–51. doi:10.1037/a0014632.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Millis, Keith (1 January 2001). "Making significant brings pleasance: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences". Emotion. one (3): 320–329. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320. PMID 12934689.
^ ^a ^b ^c Armstrong, Thomas; Detweiler-Bedell, Brian (1 January 2008). "Beauty every bit an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world". Review of General Psychology. 12 (4): 305–329. CiteSeerXx.i.1.406.1825. doi:10.1037/a0012558.
^ Véron, Eugène (1882). L'Esthetique (1st ed.). Paris. p. 35.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Silvia, Paul J. (1 January 2010). "Confusion and involvement: The role of knowledge emotions in artful experience" (PDF). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. four (2): 75–80. doi:10.1037/a0017081.
^ "Cognition Emotions: Feelings that Foster Learning, Exploring, and Reflecting". Noba . Retrieved 2021-07-02 .
^ ^a ^b ^c Eskine, Kendall J.; Kacinik, Natalie A.; Prinz, Jesse J. (1 January 2012). "Stirring images: Fearfulness, non happiness or arousal, makes fine art more sublime". Emotion. 12 (five): 1071–1074. doi:10.1037/a0027200. PMID 22309722.
^ ^a ^b ^c Silvia, Paul J.; Nusbaum, Emily C. (1 January 2011). "On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in artful chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences" (PDF). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 5 (iii): 208–214. doi:10.1037/a0021914.
^ ^a ^b Leder, Helmut; Gerger, Gernot; Dressler, Stefan G.; Schabmann, Alfred (1 January 2012). "How art is appreciated". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. six (1): ii–ten. doi:10.1037/a0026396.
^ ^a ^b ^c Silvia, Paul J. (2006). "Artistic training and interest in visual art: Applying the appraisal model of aesthetic emotions". Empirical Studies of the Arts. 24 (2): 139–161. doi:10.2190/dx8k-6wea-6wpa-fm84.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Mastandrea, Stefano; Bartoli, M.; Bove, G. (2007). "Learning through ancient art and experincing emotions with contemporary art: Comparing visits in two unlike museums". Empirical Studies of the Arts. 25 (2): 173–191. doi:10.2190/r784-4504-37m3-2370.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^east ^f Cooper, Jessica 1000.; Paul J. Silvia (2009). "Opposing art: Rejection equally an action tendency of hostile artful emotions". Empirical Studies of the Arts. 27 (one): 109–126. doi:10.2190/em.27.1.f.
^ ^a ^b ^c Xenakis, Ioannis; Arnellos, Argyris; Darzentas, John (i August 2012). "The functional function of emotions in aesthetic judgment". New Ideas in Psychology. xxx (2): 212–226. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.09.003.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^thousand ^h ⁱ ^j ^thousand ^l ^grand ⁿ Pelowski, Matthew; Akiba, Fuminori (1 Baronial 2011). "A model of fine art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience". New Ideas in Psychology. 29 (ii): 80–97. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.04.001.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^{due east} ^f ^thou Kuchinke, Lars; Trapp, Sabrina; Jacobs, Arthur G.; Leder, Helmut (one January 2009). "Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions". Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 3 (3): 156–163. doi:10.1037/a0014464.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Powell, W. Ryan; Schirillo, James A. (i August 2011). "Hemispheric laterality measured in Rembrandt's portraits using pupil diameter and aesthetic verbal judgements". Cognition & Emotion. 25 (five): 868–885. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.515709. PMID 21432647.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Blackburn, Kelsey; Schirillo, James (19 Apr 2012). "Emotive hemispheric differences measured in real-life portraits using student bore and subjective aesthetic preferences". Experimental Brain Research. 219 (4): 447–455. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3091-y. PMID 22526951.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^{due east} ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j Drake, Jennifer Eastward.; Winner, Ellen (1 January 2012). "Confronting sadness through art-making: Distraction is more beneficial than venting". Psychology of Aesthetics, Inventiveness, and the Arts. 6 (3): 255–261. doi:10.1037/a0026909. S2CID 144770751.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^eastward Dalebroux, Anne; Goldstein, Thalia R.; Winner, Ellen (2008). "Short-term mood repair through art-making: Positive emotion is more effective than venting". Motivation and Emotion. 32 (4): 288–295. doi:ten.1007/s11031-008-9105-ane.